The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:23, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2007 WSX television ratings[edit]

2007 WSX television ratings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

very crufty page for an upstart wrestling promotion. Had prod attached, but was removed. I can understand somewhat why TNA/WWE/WCW may have ratings pages (although maybe those should also be considered for deletion), but this promotion just started, and it just isn't needed. TV shows in general don't always have pages just for their ratings (not including those episode guides that have ratings intertwined. This page just isn't needed. Booshakla 02:30, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. MER-C 02:38, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete - bordering on Speedy, per above.   •The RSJ•   Talk | Sign Here 04:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. Also: Category:Wrestling Society X television ratings should probably be put in CFD. RobJ1981 08:00, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, possibly Merge with Wrestling Society X Seems to me this doesn't need to be in a seperate article. There is also an issue with maintaining week-by-week ratings information for television shows in general. That information is only useful if it can be kept current, and most of the ratings information isn't at all notable. When something requires week-by-week updates that is a negative factor, in my opinion. Moreover, even assuming you keep the ratings up to date, you can easily include that information within the television show's main article. Why have a huge subarticle just for ratings information? Dugwiki 23:01, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per above. Govvy 10:23, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.