The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 20:33, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2010 IBSA World Blind Football Championship[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable Attaboy (talk) 21:31, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Appears to pass WP:GNG from the sources provided. Extensive BBC coverage. Spiderone 08:15, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Well sourced from mainstream media coverage, per GNG. As a world championship it is the highest level of competition, thus it also qualifies for a presumption of notability, had the sourcing been inadequate. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:48, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 18:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Seems ironic that the nominator doesn't appear to have seen all the references in the article that clearly meet WP:GNG. Nfitz (talk) 22:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - seems to meet GNG. Giant Snowman 09:20, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Large amounts of coverage and meets WP:GNG easily. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 18:38, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.