The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. Deor (talk) 13:36, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2013 Mississippi Brilla season[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSEASONS. Kingjeff (talk) 23:55, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because they also fail WP:NSEASONS and WP:GNG:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 00:22, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 00:23, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:17, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:18, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:18, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:19, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:20, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:20, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All - The teams for which these individual season articles were created are barely notable themselves, as fourth-tier North American soccer (association football) clubs. Sports seasons are not inherently notable per WP:NSEASONS, and in the absence of a championship, I see no argument for any special treatment under the specific notability guideline of NSEASONS. Furthermore, the subject seasons also fail the general notability guidelines per WP:GNG for lack of significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources which exceeds WP:ROUTINE. I hope the nominating editor will continue to bring all related articles to the attention of AfD. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 06:48, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - fail WP:GNG and WP:NSEASONS. Giant Snowman 08:28, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - fail WP:GNG and WP:NSEASONS, not a team in a top professional league, no indication of any reliable sources discussing these clubs' particular seasons outside of WP:ROUTINE match reporting. Major WP:NOTSTATS issues as well due to the near complete lack of sourced prose. Fenix down (talk) 11:38, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per WP:GNG, WP:NOTSTATS. Quis separabit? 17:12, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all fails WP:NSEASONS and as noted by Fenix, major issue of WP:NOTSTATS. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 07:26, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.