The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:31, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2013 SAFF U-16 Championship squads[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List of mainly non notable players for an under-16 years tournament, some of them will become notable, but the sqauds for this tournament are not the subject of significant independent coverage and fail WP:NOTABILITY. Fram (talk) 06:47, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - LISTCRUFT. Giant Snowman 09:07, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable list. No chance of any of these players having their own article any time soon bar the one who already does. Would be more useful and concise to add a link to an external source in the championship article. Fenix down (talk) 16:31, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - We have 2012 UEFA European Under-19 Championship squads so what mistake this article has done?RRD13 (talk) 08:20, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It is both for a more limited (geographical) scope, and a younger age, making the notability of the tournament and the squads a lot less than for the U19 uefa championship. Fram (talk) 10:01, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.