- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep. The nominator has been active in the last 12 hours so has had plenty of time to expand his nomination as I asked him to do on his talk page.Bduke (Discussion) 20:21, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- 2015 ASB Classic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Too crazy and wrong. 333-blue 09:20, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Nomination makes no sense? Please give a decent argument. Plenty of media coverage of this, which seems to fulfill guidelines. JTdale Talk 11:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Part of the WTA Tour, the elite tour in the most prominent women's sport. Included in Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis/Article guidelines#Tournament. Any WTA tournament is bound to get plenty of coverage. Articles are often created in advance to show who will play. PrimeHunter (talk) 15:35, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Part of WTA Tour, nom makes no sense. --AmaryllisGardener talk 15:59, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Unless the nominator can expand the nomination to give a valid reason, I will speedy close this nomination as I have for another non-valid nomination by this user. In this case "Too crazy and wrong" could possibly be expanded to mean something, although I doubt it . --Bduke (Discussion) 20:46, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep Nonsensical nomination, abuse of AfD process.--Wolbo (talk) 11:26, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep. Hard to tell with this user if this is for real, or just another case of wanting to press the delete button. Jared Preston (talk) 18:40, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.