The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No references to support GNG and it doesn't look like any will be forthcoming. Fifth tier regional amateur leagues are almost never of a sufficiently high standard to be notable. Am happy to restore if sources do surface. Fenix down (talk) 14:18, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2018 Thailand Amateur League Southern Region[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, and fails notability standards by WP:FOOTBALL Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:44, 15 January 2019 (UTC) Adding the following as well for the same reason:[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 16:43, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 16:43, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:08, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 15:49, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 15:52, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Giant Add a lot more to this AFD, please review your vote. All articles created by the same editor and are of the same topic/reasoning. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:29, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sportsfan 1234: I strongly suggest you unbundle this AFD ASAP, otherwise it's going to get very messy very quickly, and it will be procedurally closed and you'll have to start again from scratch... Giant Snowman 17:51, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Giant Do you suggest splitting the leagues from the teams?

I'd suggest unbundling the lot and nominating individually. Bundled nominations rarely work and from recent experience with very similar AfDs, whilst the consensus is this is a non notable level of football unless a club has played in the national cup, there have been dissenters. Whilst they have never provided sources to show GNG, with so many nominations I think it unlikely we could have a clear discussion. Let me know what you want to do but I would suggest I close this as a procedural keep and you renominate individually. Fenix down (talk) 08:10, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think splitting the leagues from the teams (and having those as individuals) might be smart? Will remove the teams from this AFD. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:27, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.