- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. People are free to recreate the redirect as an editorial decision. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- 2022 FIFA World Cup qualification (AFC) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Way too soon, and the main qualification article (for all associations) does not even exist yet (it is a redirect to 2022 FIFA World Cup so why have a specific one for Asian part). Also all information are pure speculation without source. I dont think it is even worth having as redirect as it is not a likely search.Qed237 (talk) 10:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Qed237 (talk) 10:37, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick ⚓ t ⚓ c ⚓ s 12:42, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to 2022 FIFA World Cup Generally continental qualification articles redirect to the main qualification article until we have concrete information. However, that's a redirect to the main World Cup article at this point, so this should be too. Smartyllama (talk) 14:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I see your point, but I dont see a good reason to keep a page as a redirect when the "real target" itself at this stage is a redirect. If that is the case, editors could just create a lot of these sub-sub articles and just redirect to the big main tournament. It is just WP:TOOSOON. Qed237 (talk) 16:10, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.