The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Pastor Theo (talk) 01:31, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

280 Zzzap / Dodgem[edit]

Similarly related to another article; a variant of a classic game in arcade format. There's no content here, and there's no indication that either are notable. Shadowjams (talk) 20:56, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the article is a mess. i looked for evidence of notability on Google, and found none. I'm open to being swayed in the other direction if reliable sources are produced. LoverOfTheRussianQueen (talk) 21:08, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unless some more information can come out about it. Are there targets for redirect? --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:52, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - This article is very similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amazing Maze / Tic Tac Toe. The apparent obvious redirect is Dodgem, which although a real game, is not really notable enough to spin off to other topics. This isn't really a plausible redirect term either. Who types in "280..." as the beginning of a search for a game with another name that's apparently more well known. Shadowjams (talk) 05:36, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 22:56, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subject matter appears non-notable. --TreyGeek (talk) 19:51, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.