- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Tone 20:18, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- 2S15 Norov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't find much about this in the Google search index. The article just solely rely upon a single source and that too is in Russian language. Abishe (talk) 12:00, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 12:00, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 12:00, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:20, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:20, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I'm not seeing any valid reason for deletion. It's to be expected I think that references to a Soviet weapon are in Russian, and there is no prohibition against using Russian sources for articles, or indeed for an article to be wholly based on non-English language sources. It crops up in other Russian language sources, the Russian wikipedia's article on it is at ru:2С15, and a search in Russian will reveal images of it as well as further sources. The fact that mentions are scarce in English sources are understandable, it was apparently a development of the 2S1 Gvozdika developed by the Stela works, but after a long and torturous design process, it was eventually shut down with only a few prototypes built. From the pictures are available, some of these still exist in various states of disrepair. As with many articles, it could use improvement and expansion, but Wikipedia:Deletion is not cleanup. Spokoyni (talk) 04:01, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.