The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This was speediable. No sources and full of nonsense. No need to clutter AFD with obvious cases like this. Friday (talk) 14:49, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

3awww[edit]

3awww (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete, to me this is a borderline attack page with no references or google hits Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:45, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I'm no longer convinced this is an attack page, even though I've nominated as such previously. However, I've communicated with the author of the entry and it's clear that this is an unpublished (or at least minimally circulated) book. I can't even find it online. Hairhorn (talk) 14:48, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.