The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh 21:03, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

50 Hollowz Productions[edit]

Unnotable production company; no secondary sources provided; high extent of original reserach and self promotion. Bit Lordy (talk) 11:15, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A non notable company who fail WP:MUSIC. Likely a use of Wikipedia as a social networking site. Created by a user named 50 Hollowz Productions, so it's also a WP:COI and self-bio. This is probably speedy deletable under G11. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 16:42, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No assertion of notability, borders on speedable. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 22:01, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:06, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quality background information, company is capable of contacting Sony Music Entertainment, therefore the company must be somewhat legitimate. Documentation most likely used as informing purposes, but the article could use more input to receive an encyclopedic quality. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Notorious 1 (talk • contribs) 21:00, 30 June 2008 (UTC) — Notorious 1 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete WP:MUSIC doesn't cover record labels but 50 Hollowz definitely fails WP:ORG due to absence of coverage in multiple independent reliable sources nancy ^(talk) 10:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.