The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:41, 20 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

9/11 Guilt[edit]

This 9/11 conspiracy video is not notable. Searching the term on Google [1] yields only 338 results. It's also nowhere to be found on IMDB. This compares with other articles, 9-11: The Road to Tyranny, 911 In Plane Site, and Loose Change (video), which are all listed on IMDB and google return thousands of search results. --Aude (talk contribs) 16:21, 15 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Nominate and delete. --Aude (talk contribs) 16:38, 15 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete as proposed. Gazpacho 17:56, 15 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete per nom LaszloWalrus 18:45, 15 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete per nom. 9/11 truthiness movement cruft. BoojiBoy 19:05, 15 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete — per nom Martinp23 20:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete per nom. —dima ^/sb.tk/ 21:07, 15 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Keep Yashmok va tro dentoldi kallaq. --82.9.55.184 02:22, 16 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  Comment: This is an english speaking Wikipedia. --HResearcher 05:24, 16 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  Coment Dude! If your PC is talking to you, I'd suggest it's maybe time for some sleep. Only kidding, that was me, I must not have been signed in. Apologies for the mess, I think I was messing around with my keymap configuration, and forgot to change it back to UK English after I had finished. I can't even recall what it was I meant to type. I don't think that the video should be viewed in comparison with other 911 videos though. It's a bit like comparing 'Robinson Crusoe' with 'Titanic' (or whatever that horrible film from a few years ago is called). Both have their own following, just because one of them gets a lot of airtime on mainstream media, doesn't make the other one any less relevant. --Tess Tickle 13:41, 16 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --HResearcher 05:24, 16 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete per nom Konman72 09:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete per nom. wikipediatrix 14:09, 16 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete — per nom. SynergeticMaggot 21:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete as nowhere near notable enough. If this were big, 10,000 google results would be expected, which (last time I checked) wasn't too hard to achieve. Draicone turns up more than 10,000 yet I've never seen a 'Draicone' other than me. If IMDB doesn't list it, I seriously doubt its notability, and while I haven't yet seen a notability policy for movies in the WP space (please tell me if you know of one) I doubt this would meet the criteria. --Draicone ^(talk) 11:37, 18 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.