The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Firsfron of Ronchester 21:09, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@field (video game)[edit]

@field (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find video game sources: "@field (video game)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Does not appear to pass WP:GNG at this time -- I cannot find reliable, independent sources of significant coverage. The game is listed in several directories/listings, but no typical video game media seem to have proper content. The provided Sony blog is pretty much COI here and I would not use it to establish notability. Game's title makes is slightly problematic to search, so apologies if I missed any usable sources. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 12:37, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - I wouldn't use the term COI,but rather it is a primary source, which can't be used to establish notability. What a horrible name to do searches on. I am sure there has to be a review out there somewhere, but the name is going to be problematic on searching, as you stated. I will abstain from my !vote until such a time I can find them. Turlo Lomon (talk) 15:46, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The best sources I could find are this, which doesn't like a reliable secondary source, and this, which is not significant coverage. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 21:12, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No significant reviews or RS articles other than empty database listings. czar · · 17:04, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.