The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sir Sputnik (talk) 05:19, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A.C. Montagnana[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability claimed other than this team exists, looks like it's shifted around in the minor of the minor soccer leagues and very little to no real coverage. UnrepentantTaco (talk) 19:52, 15 June 2013 (UTC) [Edit reverted as per WP:BE and [1]. Unscintillating (talk) 19:59, 23 June 2013 (UTC)][reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - likely to have played in the Italian Cup and therefore be considered notable, further research required. Giant Snowman 10:19, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I believe a club that have played in the Serie C (the third tier of Italian football) should be considered notable even if it was more than 50 years ago. We don't have a notability guideline for football clubs we should follow the essay WP:FOOTYN which says that clubs playing in the domestic cup should be regarded as notable. Mentoz86 (talk) 09:54, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close, speedy keep: The nominator was blocked as of 06:52, 21 June 2013 for sock puppetry per a discussion "Disruptive creation of groundless AFDs, probable sockpuppetry". Also nominator cannot vote and removed it inside the nomination.Crtew (talk) 16:19, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SK 2a The closer should keep in mind the large number of nominations made on a large, diverse set of articles that the nominator made on the same day.Crtew (talk) 05:32, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.