- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. —SW— verbalize 19:25, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- A2Z Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Masses of refs, but most are own-goals or directory listings. Other demonstrate that share of the company are bought and sold. Nothing demonstrates notability as required by WP:CORP. Much is is highly promotion and fails is WP:ARTSPAM Velella Velella Talk 20:40, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:23, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:23, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—This article is a perfect example of how to make something look notable to drive-by reference counters, but in reality there is not a single reliable, third-party reference in the entire lot. Non-notable company. Livit⇑Eh?/What? 15:21, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Would you please elaborate? Secret of success (talk) 11:38, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete - Thanks Livitup for your Deletion FAQs [1] it has reaffirmed my conviction that the article deserves a reconsideration and doesn't deserve to be deleted.
That said, A2Z Group is a Gurgaon headquartered company that employs more than 30000 employees in the renewable energy production business.
It has many renowned and successful Indian businessmen like Rakesh Jhunjhunwala [1], Brij Singh [2], etc. on it's director board
Apart from that A2Z Group has invested all its resources in renewable resource generation (Waste to energy) and hence has helped reclaim a lot of waste land and keep many major cities clean. [3] [4] [5] Let me know if I can provide any other information.
Willonthemove (talk) 06:14, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- You will find more details about my research on one of A2Z Group's business unit at A2Z Group's talk page. Thanks all! Willonthemove (talk) 10:40, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I now realize the major cause of confusion! Most editors are searching for references for A2Z Group. A2Z Group as the name suggests is a group of business units and therefore you will find a lot of references for each of its business units namely:-
Willonthemove (talk) 07:56, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Pending Keep - I don't have the patience to go through each and every unique criterion for a company as per WP:CORP, but if at all anything, I think the article seems to satisfy WP:GNG, which is likely to make it encyclopedic and expandable. If many of them are indeed trivial (I believe that one or two list out the company's details), there are still quite a few alternative sources which seem to provide info about it, and instead of rushing on deletion, discussion would be better. Secret of success (talk) 10:38, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand based on the prior discussion. Thee is fairly certain to be content.This is better than trying to do an article on each constituent company--even if that could be done, it is more helpful to start with this general one. DGG ( talk ) 04:23, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep on similar grounds to DGG. Quite frankly, most of the individual companies probably aren't notable enough to warrant individual articles, but we have this lovely independently-sourced group of them that meets WP:GNG on its own, and the companies are notable enough to be included in a group article. - Jorgath (talk) (contribs) 18:02, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:55, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Question and comment. I am gathering from this discussion that this article was subject to a prior deletion discussion and was kept, but I am not finding that nomination, and it does not seem to have been noted on this article's talk page. The current page contains swatches of non-neutral intentional vagueness (e.g. an integrated solution provider for asset management services) that need to be reworked into English or removed if this is kept. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:19, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you suggest improvements and I will attempt to modify text accordingly? by William Emmanual | Send me a Message 09:14, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.