The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep per unanimity of respondents. (non-admin closure) Skomorokh 00:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
no useful content in this article Oo7565 (talk) 06:11, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, ifsources can be found to verify the claims of "instant hits, taking top spots in music charts across the region of Francophone West Africa". Beeblbrox (talk) 06:35, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep based on [1] and [2] although the article needs definite work and the redirect to Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy should be looked at as AURA should at least go to the disambiguation page. Also, as far as I'm aware "no useful content" isn't grounds for deletion.Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:43, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep If the groups are reasonably notable this is likely to be also. Lack of meaningful content is a reason for deletion, but thatdoes not seem to be the case here. No attempt by the nom. to look for references- DGG (talk) 00:09, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. The only reason for deletion given by the nominator is clearly invalid in this case. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.