The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NW (Talk) 02:07, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Game With Future[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD; I don't see any notability; cannot find any reliable sources Chzz ► 23:25, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete notability not asserted. Josh Parris 00:30, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 19:07, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Complete rubbish. ----Jack | ^{talk page} 19:14, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Unfortunately, the extra time gained by the AfD instead ofa a CSD tag hasn't been used to improve, and other articles from same user don't seem to have gotten very far (see their talk page). No citation/sources to show notability and etc etc etc, I mean as a technical explanation. ♪ daTheisen (talk) 03:34, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unverified; zero web search hits for ' "a game with future" +hoitom ' Marasmusine (talk) 10:46, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.