The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. LFaraone 00:11, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Public Nuisance Train Man -Target of Legend-[edit]

A Public Nuisance Train Man -Target of Legend- (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searching under the English name brought up zero sources. Searching under the Japanese name only brought up Wikipedia reprints. Fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 20:59, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:01, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:01, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:02, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not seeing any third-party coverage to verify notability. --DAJF (talk) 14:36, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I located the official webpage of the game (published by its developer) at [1] (warning, contains nudity). The characters from the title of the article are recognizable in the image, below the English words "MOLESTER TRAININGMAN - GAIDEN". This is not an independent source but it's something. Dcoetzee 13:01, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That's not actually for the same game, though. The title is "伝説へのチェイサー", so it's presumably another title in the series. A link to the official website for the game described in this article is already provided in the "External links" section. --DAJF (talk) 13:21, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment- I found this, which seems it might be an independent review, given that it is somewhat critical of the game. I don't know anything about the site, however. Michitaro (talk) 19:56, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Here is the Google Translate of the About page. I don't think that it is reliable because the staff use usernames, but I could be wrong about that. Also, before people view this - there is nudity in banner ads. SL93 (talk) 21:48, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.