The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:30, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aaadietya Pandey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Survived an earlier AfD in 2006. Page still has long term issues and notability is questionable. Google search yields nothing significant, and there seems to be no page in Hindi about this entry. MakeSense64 (talk) 08:27, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete : 1: lacks adequate citations 2. doubtful notability.FeatherPluma (talk) 10:31, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep -- there are a lot of references in Times of India that support notability claim. Wikid^as© 07:10, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For example? MakeSense64 (talk) 08:06, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: See previous AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaadietya. — Satori Son 01:26, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete per lack of ANY notable mentions, none of which were found on both Yahoo! and Google. SwisterTwister talk 22:43, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete No reliable sources independent of the subject confer notability. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 04:42, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• delete there seems to be too many problems with this one. -- Zac Δ ^talk! 10:35, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.