The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 02:23, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Abandon Chip![edit]

Abandon Chip! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This fanzine is for a club that no longer exists. Of the six references, only two mention this magazine and they are very insignificant mentions at that. All in all, this fanzine fails to reach noteworthy status other than being "the longest running Scarborough fanzine" which doesn't amount to much outside of local interest. v/r - TP 13:25, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - difficult one, but I tend to agree that notability has not been demonstrated.Deb (talk) 14:32, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. czar · · 16:20, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. czar · · 16:20, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:46, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Scarborough Athletic F.C.; not independently notable but a possible search term. GiantSnowman 20:50, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- Very short-lived as a publication for the Scarborough F.C., which was a League side 1987-99 only; then continued irregularly for the barely notable Scarborough Athletic F.C., claiming to be its successor. This was all after the club ceased to be a League club. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:16, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.