The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. —Kurykh 04:19, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Achduart[edit]

Achduart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non notable cluster of houses, not even enough to be a village Sploooshman 08:38, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per WP:OUTCOMES. Although not a guideline or policy, consensus has been in the past that cities, villages, and towns are all sufficiently notable. --Dhartung | Talk 10:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But this is not a city, town our village -Nv8200p talk 02:12, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not even a village? JJL 15:36, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not enough to be a village. OysterGuitarst 22:42, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, real place. Five houses could make this in the nature of 15 to 30 people or so, we have articles about places with smaller populations. Lots of them. Corvus cornix 03:20, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per above, not notable for a village. Bearian 00:38, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, one google news result for "Achduart". Achiltibuie indicates that is the "end of the line". It appears to also be known as Torridonian, which turns up many more news results. John Vandenberg 08:29, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep --MacRusgail 16:15, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not large enough to be a village. A keep should not be predicated on the fact that some articles have fewer people, they might be notable for other reasons (or maybe should also be considered for AfD). No sources asserting notability Tdmg 17:56, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. -- John Vandenberg 08:29, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No significant third party information sources. -Nv8200p talk 02:12, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - It is an actual place where people live. Google Maps recognizes it. Just because it's not technically called a "village" doesn't mean it's not inherently notable. --Oakshade 14:25, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I consider all settlements to be notable, no matter how small. Cheers, DWaterson 23:20, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.