The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (A3/G5) by MacGyverMagic. Non-admin closure. MuZemike (talk) 14:43, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ackuron[edit]

Non-notable future game. No reliable sources provided, none found. Article runs afoul of WP:CRYSTAL and links provided are blacklisted. No bias against recreation once game is released and reviewed in reliable sources. TN‑X-Man 18:52, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 20:34, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete How long it has been under development is irrelevant, no prejudice to recreation once the game is released, right now it's all speculation. --Terrillja _talk 20:43, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

keep.--24.171.0.229 (talk) 05:25, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

keep--Admiralxgmx (talk) 05:28, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No references provided (there were some citations, but to a blacklisted site, so I removed them), no significant coverage from reliable, independent sources; therefore fails WP:V and WP:N. Marasmusine (talk) 14:39, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete (G5) — article by a sock of a (de facto) banned user — Xgmx (talk · contribs). MuZemike (talk) 06:31, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.