The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 04:14, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actuality (Hegel)[edit]

Actuality (Hegel) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dictionary article. Rathfelder (talk) 08:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now. Really the article on absolute idealism should be expanded with more detail on Hegel's philosophy, which could well include actuality, which is part of that philosophy (the SEP mentions actualities in the main article on dialectics). There isn't enough to justify a separate article and the current absolute idealism article doesn't have the detail to warrant a merge. Mortee (talk) 13:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:47, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mortee A term in dictionaries could be definited with one sentence as long as it makes the determination of concept , for this acticle there is an enough determinition . The Absolute Idealism defineted in, is the philosophy of Hegel as a whole , while (Actuality) is only one of Hegel's Idealist theories , therefore there is no reason to put all details of a whole philosophy to define a simple term .

to bind people by X policies is to bind thier intellectual freedom , you must give an objective argumentation rather than argue with X laws like those of wikipedia. --Bilal philosopher (talk) 12:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Nördic Nightfury 08:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.