The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:26, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adaptive Wireless Path Protocol[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been tagged since 2012 for having no references. The external links are to publications by Cisco, whose communication protocol this is. I did not find multiple reliable and independent sources needed to establish notability. Edison (talk) 22:43, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 00:13, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 00:13, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delet Confusing jargon filled article that reads like a textbook... how has this lived for six years? 💵Money emoji💵^Talk 15:33, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As it stands, needs more RS, most of this is not independant of Cisco material. Deathlibrarian (talk) 01:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no references in article and google news comes up empty. Google books turns up a couple of results, but not significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 23:06, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.