The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Cambridge UCCE & MCCU players. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:41, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adil Arif[edit]

Adil Arif (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable cricketer, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 15:47, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:26, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to List of Cambridge UCCE & MCCU players 7 FC matches for uni sides, but I'm not seeing anything other than match reports, so no real significant coverage. Redirect a suitable WP:ATD and another that should have been BOLDly redirected to save the AfD. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 16:42, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:18, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:18, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:18, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to List of Cambridge UCCE & MCCU players as per Rugbyfan22. Frigidpolarbear (talk) 15:35, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:NCRIC. Very very poor quality article on a sportsman. scope_creep^Talk 21:47, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment scope_creep much like this article on a pond. StickyWicket (talk) 22:12, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect. He hasn't done much after his FC appearances, is currently a cricket coach at Oundle, but a redirect to a list seems sensible. StickyWicket (talk) 22:15, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment @AssociateAffiliate: The primary difference, is that lochan has got 3 independent sources and is packed with detailed properties that describe it exactly. This article has five db/script generated references that are woeful. There is a world of difference. Nothing with do with the size of the article. I see your the article creator. If you think it is a pond, then your really must in a downer. scope_creep^Talk 22:26, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: @Scope creep: Charles Elton would agree it's definitely a pond. And I did create the article, but I don't care all that much for it hence my redirect vote. StickyWicket (talk) 08:53, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AssociateAffiliate: Ponds are artificial constructions, wheras this is natural. I'm not that keen on doing these lochan articles, but there are tremedously popular with the fly-fishing crown and they tend to be great walks. Who is this Charles Elton exactly and why is he known or associated with ponds? scope_creep^Talk 18:40, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.