The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 01:22, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adrian Wykes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable cricketer DocumentError (talk) 22:23, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:00, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:00, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Cricketers who have appeared in at least one List A, First-class cricket or T20 match is notable. This cricketer has played in 3 List A matches. Cricinfo Abishe (talk) 15:46, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. List A cricketer. Once again I will use my regular argument of "why don't these people make themselves known nine years earlier so they can protest against articles like these before we write them?" I would love to know what, to this user, constitutes "not notable". As with most first-class cricketers it seems to be "never heard of". Bobo . 16:50, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Appears to pass WP:NSPORTS. -- Dane ^talk 05:09, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as they pass WP:NCRICKET criterion #1 (played List A cricket). --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 06:16, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.