The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:47, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aero Express[edit]

Aero Express (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is merely about a bus service that only operated between Hyderabad city and its airport. That too, the service is no longer operating. Normally, such information is contained in the "Access" section of airport articles, and this article's subject has been mentioned – honestly, I don't feel it is notable enough to have its own entire article. — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 03:41, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 04:14, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 04:14, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• While it's true that a summary would normally be found in the airport article, that doesn't mean we can't also have a more detailed article on the route if there's enough sources and content to support one. In this case the subject seems to have been covered by multiple national news sources, so it would appear to satisfy the Wikipedia:Notability requirements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.106.79.125 (talk) 20:45, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or merge to the airport article per WP:NOTTRAVEL.Charles (talk) 10:07, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I realize that there is some coverage in the news, but it's mostly routine stuff like "hey here's a new bus line," "we added a stop to the line," "we cancelled the line oops". I don't know that that really qualifies as being in-depth enough for the purposes of having its own article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:37, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.