The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Keeping based on the notability of winning two awards since no one has contested that they are significant for publishers in Bangladesh. Liz Read! Talk! 05:16, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agamee Prakashani[edit]

Agamee Prakashani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG M.parvage (talk) 10:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The first mention that I found of it, mentioned that it was one of the premier publisher's in Bangladesh. It had published more than 3000 books. That is a major publisher. Its been going for 37 years which means its publishing on average, more than 80 books a year. That is a major publisher in anybody's book, making it notable. scope_creepTalk 17:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source assessment table: prepared by User:m.parvage
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
Source 1 ? No No Some words from an interview No
Source 2 No No No No
Source 3 ~ Yes A recognized newspaper No just a summary No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using ((source assess table)).

M.parvage (talk) 04:19, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 05:49, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.