The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 19:14, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed Abdultaofik[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In the absence of evidence suggesting that Latvian league is fully professional, I think we have to assume it is not. Hence he would fail WP:ATHLETE. Oleola (talk) 11:32, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:28, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the Latvian league is indeed not fully-professional, meaning that this player fails WP:NFOOTBALL; he also fails WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 19:30, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Argyle 4 Life^talk 20:29, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - he fails WP:GNG, and he has not appeared in a fully pro league meaning he fails WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:33, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — -- Cirt (talk) 17:37, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.