The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:52, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aimee Challenor[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP, based half on primary sources and half on glancing namechecks of her existence in media coverage which isn't about her, of a person whose only substantive claims of notability are as an LGBT issues spokesperson for a minor political party and as a non-winning candidate for election to a local city council. Neither of these confer an WP:NPOL pass -- but she doesn't pass WP:GNG either as the media coverage here is not about her. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 02:51, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:53, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:15, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:15, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing actually suggesting solid independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:15, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as being an unelected candidate in a local election and being a spokesperson for a political party is not enough to pass WP:NPOL. veganfishcake (talk) 01:45, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete She ran for and lost a run for a city council position. It is not clear if she would have been notable if she had won, but she lost so she is clearly not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:39, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.