The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 23:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Downs[edit]

Alan Downs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This subject appears to fail WP:PROF. There is a pretty obvious WP:COI on the part of the creator, and the article is loaded with peacock terms. Guy (Help!) 20:50, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Seems like a perfectly good article that is substantiated and of a notable individual. Of course, it can always be improved and added to. Dwain (talk) 20:17, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Review in Personnel Psychology vol. 51 issue 2 suggests he has done a fair bit of work in the "group narcissism" field. Ottre 21:54, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.