The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Albo kali silat[edit]

Procedural nomination. Article was requested for speedy deletion by an IP editor, who asked me to start this debate since IP editors can't create the page as is necessary. I am neutral. Mango juice^talk 03:28, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to nominate it, because I got only 3 distinct google hits when I searched for it: [1] with the words in succession, and under 300 when I don't even use quotation marks: [2]. 146.186.44.217 03:40, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with anon user above. Non-verifiable. Non-notable. Where are the sources? --N Shar 03:58, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. "Too interesting" for A7? I laughed when I read that, for some reason. --N Shar 03:59, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It seems that this is a real, albeit obscure, martial art. The anon's Google results are accurate. It's possible someone could write a passable article about the subject, but since I can't find any reliable sources, there's nothing in this article that could be kept anyway. --Djrobgordon 04:02, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:V, single digit ghits. MER-C 06:18, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As above. Vassyana 11:47, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.