The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:42, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
article on non-notable album by previously speedied band. creator removed prod. tomasz. 20:48, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If band is not notable, then the album isn't either. Article contains little more than the track listing (aside from band members and a trivia section, neither of which belong in the article), which would normally be merged to the band's page per WP:MUSIC. Insufficent context to merit separate inclusion. Hersfold(t/a/c) 21:09, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:MUSIC. Non-notable band and album Bfigura(talk) 21:44, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Songs or albums by deleted artists can be speedily deleted using ((db-reason)) as I've done many times before. This is no exception. Spellcast 06:40, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. i did not know this, but that's very useful, cheers. tomasz. 09:07, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, ((db-reason|Unnecessary song/album page of a deleted artist)) always works. It's just common sense. If a musician is deemed non-notable, why on Earth would their works be? Spellcast 05:10, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
yes, i entirely agree with yr reasoning, just didn't know we were "allowed" to do that as it were. off to have at some more albums with that line now! tomasz. 16:22, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.