- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:44, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Alejandro Gorrin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
He has not played a professional senior game at club or international level. Article fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Also fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 06:56, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 06:56, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 06:56, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 06:56, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I personally would keep the article as subject might meet WP:GNG [1], [2] [3], [4] etc., but it is also possible to incubate the page - Wellington Phoenix starts in the A-League on 12 October and I believe he will almost certainly appear in the roster. No need to delete. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 09:02, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no guarantee that he will play. He may get injured or who knows what might happen. The article can be re-created easily when he actually makes a pro appearance.Simione001 (talk) 09:44, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage (the sources provided above are routine sports journalism), meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. The fact that potential future appearances do not confer notability remains one of the most long standing consensuses of the WikiProject Football. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:38, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:40, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Not convinced the coverage has been "significant" enough to justify an article at this point, sorry. GiantSnowman 15:52, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- No problem, I'll incubate the content in my user space and will watch the results at http://www.wellingtonphoenix.com/ in the next weeks to recreate it. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 16:29, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- That also works - so I'd ask the closing admin to USERFY. GiantSnowman 12:37, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.