The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 02:03, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Henshall[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

AfD - nominated because the player fails WP:ATH - person has not made any first-team appearances (has only been named on the bench for the first team) as yet. Proposed delete until/ if meets notability criteria Steve-Ho (talk) 12:03, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Procedural renomination. This was redlinked in the deletion log. I remain neutral Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 11:44, 28 March 2010 (UTC)~~ [reply]

Comment I presume the nomination was because this footballer hasnt made any first-team appearances, but the nominator has been informed about the renomination and the need the need for his/her input so don't take my word for it :-D Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 11:55, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Being named on the subs bench for the JPT thingy trophy falls well short of WP:ATH - he's not entered the field in a League One match so he doesn't meet that subguideline. Representing the England U16 team is a good achievement, but only Olympic or full international appearances would qualify under WP:ATH. I don't see significant coverage in reliable sources for WP:BIO either. Most of the article is POV pumping this prospect up, which is of course inappropriate for an encyclopaedia. --Mkativerata (talk) 23:38, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, recreate should he play professionally. If he's as good as the article seems to want to make out, that should be in a year or two -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:56, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now, recreate if he ever passes the ATHLETE guideline. -- Big Dom 08:16, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.