The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:15, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Kulbashian[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The quasi-judicial law and court under which the evidence was submitted has been repealed by the Canadian Government for being unconstitutional The Article, once edited, ends up becoming mostly blank with no content WikiErrorCorrection (talk) 03:48, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural note. No AfD notice was placed on the article until 00:25, 18 July 2013 (UTC). That said, there was no activity here, so I don't think it necessarily affected the AfD process. —C.Fred (talk) 00:26, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

More information Law was repealed because Canadian Parliament and Senate felt it was unconstutional. Having information about a "fine" issued against someone under an unconstitutional Act is prejudicial. It was not a criminal court, there was no conviction. [1] [2] WikiErrorCorrection (talk) 00:35, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's content-related and off the main point of whether this person is notable. —C.Fred (talk) 00:43, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Once the content relating the the overturned Law is removed, the article becomes a stub. Notability is questionable as well. Someone who ran an ISP were racist messages were posted is not notable. WikiErrorCorrection (talk) 15:27, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:20, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 05:52, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.