The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted after the original author requested deletion.--Commander Keane 23:31, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Palestras[edit]

Disputed speedy. I think it is a pure nn-bio and the author has kindly confirmed that it is an autobiography. -- RHaworth 11:50, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unless expanded, sourced and properly cited Alf photoman 14:32, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete not so much for the fact that it's an autobio (although I can't say that helps) but that it doesn't assert notability. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:47, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lacks notablity and significance. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kai a simon (talk • contribs) 17:13, 23 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I created the page, and I say delete it. I'm sure my user page will do just as good. I'm sorry if I caused any problems. B Lizzard 17:55, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above and per article's creator. Fails to assert notability, so may be speedied. Edison 18:25, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note I have left a message for the creator to but the db-user template on the article. SkierRMH 20:59, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.