The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Nomination withdrawn, non admin closure. Szzuk (talk) 20:43, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alexa Clay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG and WP:Bio. The sources provided are mere self-published material. I really can't fine the evidence of notability perhaps WP:TOOSOON Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 12:06, 12 November 2015 (UTC) Nomination withdrawn to Keep. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 18:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 12:07, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 12:07, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 12:07, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep Comment, possibly redirect to the book The Misfit Economy which easily meets WP:NBOOK with reviews in The Financial Times - [1], The Economist - [2], The National - [3], Forbes (actually an interview) - [4], New York Daily News - [5], Dallas News - [6], Stanford Social Innovation Review - [7], Harvard Business Review - [8], phew, I think that will do. Coolabahapple (talk) 18:08, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NBIO is not the same as WP:NBOOK and redirect will only be possible if the book in question already have an article here. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 20:43, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done, here it is: The Misfit Economy, have changed my above keep to a comment of possible redirect, but to be balanced we would also need to make a redirect for co-author, Phillips, so maybe just delete unless editors believe Clay is notable apart from the book.Coolabahapple (talk) 17:58, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating The Misfit Economy. However, I have no prejudice against a redirect but it seems she meet WP:AUTHOR#3 per the review of her work. I'm withdrawing my nomination with alacrity for now. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 18:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.