The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete (see WP:BIODELETE for more info). ansh 666 08:11, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Zlamal[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MUSICIAN and WP:GNG. A search throws up nothing of note. On Discogs here there a few entries as having produced a handful of rather obscure records. A COI editor has repeatedly added comments that he is included in 3 vanity press books published by American Biographical Institute and International Biographical Centre. The only 2 editors adding to this article are WP:SPAs that both claim to be acting under instruction of the subject. Domdeparis (talk) 14:55, 18 September 2017 (UTC) The subject, Alexander Zlamal, has requested that this page be deleted. Earlier he asked me to add the following sentence, but then decided that the process is futile. Removal of 3 references (those easiest to verify) from--and constant interference by some "musical expert" into--my bio-professional data in the Wikipedia can be understand only as an intentional personal insult. Alexander Zlamal[reply]

As you may or may not know anyone can write an article about anyone on Wikipedia and the subject of that article cannot request the deletion of the article unless it is for a valid reason. The major contributors to this article are claiming to personally know the subject. If you as an editor wish that this article be deleted please don't hesitate to vote. The reason given in the nomination by myself is that he does not meet notability criteria. I have removed 3 references to vanity press biographies and you can click on the wikilinks and read what the article s says about these who's who that most definitely do not count as reliable. Just because the removal of these sources is in his eyes an insult is most definitely nota valid reason and if I may be so bold a little childish and seems like he/you are throwing their/your toys out of the WP:PRAM. Domdeparis (talk) 16:26, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:38, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, Mr Zlamal wants the article deleted, and no one is making an argument to keep it. I removed the text above because I put it there at his request, and then he decided it was pointless. Please go ahead with the deletion of the article ASAP.Greydrizzle

Please do not remove text from a talk page. If you wish you can redact a text as I have done. Domdeparis (talk) 20:31, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.