The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 23:04, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Hajizade[edit]

Ali Hajizade (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The hits I'm getting on him in searches (and not on the general of the same name), are all by him, not about him. Can't find any in-depth coverage on him to suggest he passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:27, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Coverage focusses on the project rather than the individual. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:23, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:17, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: This person is a well known political analyst in Azerbaijan, and is widely quoted and interviewed in international mass media. I think he qualifies as a person 'widely cited by peers', per WP:AUTHOR. --میرعلی 797 (talk) 10:56, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: He is one of the important political analytics of Azerbaijab and South Caucasus. --Sefer azeri (talk) 19:13, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Ali Hajizade has been cited by notable outlets, including Princeton University Press. So, I think this qualifies him as a notable person. Plus, I was able to find out that he was awarded Honorary Diploma of President — a high-level state decoration that includes recipients such as Joseph Kobzon, Polad Bülbüloğlu, Zeynab Khanlarova and others — Toghrul R (t) 07:08, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, as there is overall enough coverage for notability.Jackattack1597 (talk) 00:59, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - note that none of the keep !votes are based on policy, except for the last one, which doesn't address the lack of sigcov in the article, or available in searches. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:19, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.