The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus DGG ( talk ) 20:20, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alicja Ruchala[edit]

Alicja Ruchala (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. " I looked for sources, but only found minor coverage, the best was a short news report in an online but mainstream Polish portal at [1]. I don't think she passes WP:NMODEL yet, but maybe someone can find something better. Also, considering how easy it is to be a notable sportsmen, I wonder if NMODEL isn't too tough. The article and the source I found notes she has been a cover girl for notable magazines (Vogue, Elle). Maybe that should be enough. Thoughts? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:27, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete non-notable model.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:57, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:22, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:22, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep reliable source confirming front page of Vogue and Elle etc seems notable for a model by most ordinary judgement irrespective of the SNG Atlantic306 (talk) 02:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This is far from notable. Firstly I do not see any significant coverage in reliable sources which is required for GNG. Secondly, I do see any reliable sources which talk about the subject gracing the covers of any magazine. The only sources I found (gosee.us) is a PR agency which cannot be considered a reliable source. Neither does the subject satisfy the SNG at WP:NMODEL. As this fails GNG and the SNG, I will go with a delete. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:16, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the sources provided are unconvincing and do not seem to pass WP:GNG.----~ (Paulmcdonald )

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.