The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:44, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All-time Thai Premier League table[edit]

All-time Thai Premier League table (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. PROD reason was "Non-notable per precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All-time English Football League 1st Division Table." and I stand by that, although I will give a further rationale. Firstly, the article, which consists of three short sentences and a table, is completely unreferenced and looks like it is probably original research. Secondly, as it is a table of statistics, and that is all it will ever be, I feel it is a violation of WP:NOTSTATS. Lastly, it is non-notable because there is no significant coverage in independent reliable sources discussing this "all-time" table. Jenks24 (talk) 15:27, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. —Jenks24 (talk) 15:28, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. —Jenks24 (talk) 15:28, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 00:55, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom - this kind of table serves no purpose and violates a number of our guidelines (NOTSTATS, OR, LISTCRUFT). GiantSnowman 00:56, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Pointless statistic overload - these stats don't really even mean anything. Fails guidelines as per GiantSnowman. Bretonbanquet (talk) 01:09, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Complete unreferenced, should go. Calistemon (talk) 17:33, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I contested the PROD because the prior AfD was closed early, and may or may not apply because it discussed a league from a lower(?) national level. I have no opinion against deleting the article. And then there's All-time FA Premier League table, which is likely to be disputed. --Paul_012 (talk) 02:41, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.