The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:15, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Altona Gate Shopping Centre[edit]

Altona Gate Shopping Centre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:MILL. Mall size is less than 30,000 m2, hardly substantial for an article. Trivial mentions in sources. Ajf773 (talk) 23:20, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 23:20, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 23:20, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I have used this centre for years. There is nothing special about it. --Bduke (talk) 23:27, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Haha entertaining remark however I'm not sure your use of, or opinion about the special-ness of a mall is relevant to it's legitimate existence on Wikipendia! Cabrils (talk) 21:55, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was in my own way pointing out that I do I do not think this shopping centre has been noticed in reliable sources to the level that is required. The TV show mentioned below might be recognition, but it is not referenced in the article so should be removed at the end of this AfD discussion if the article is kept and it is still not referenced. --Bduke (talk) 11:42, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, I agree. Cabrils (talk) 23:04, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per indiscriminate directory entry. ——SerialNumber54129 11:57, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom as non-notable. --Lockley (talk) 17:57, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep ProQuest lists scores of newspaper articles but not sure how substantial they are. Certainly the current entry needs some references. If the page survives this challenge I will look to adding some references (if that helps). Current entry is certainly not overly promotional. Cabrils (talk) 21:55, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I searched newspaper archives. Numerous mentions in The Age but they were all trivial: job adverts, liquor licence applications, event listings etc.. No significant coverage.--Pontificalibus 08:43, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep if true that it was in a TV show. Cheesesteak1 (talk) 07:20, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete There are many thousands of shopping centers in the world which are not automatically notable; this does not stand out with substantive RSes. Reywas92^Talk 02:51, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:NCORP and WP:NBUILD.--Pontificalibus 08:43, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• DELETE WP:ROTM. Acnetj (talk) 03:05, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.