The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 10:06, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:04, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - hasn't played at a high enough level to be considered notable. GiantSnowman 19:05, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - currently playing at 13th level of English football ... no evidence of having played any higher - [1]. Nfitz (talk) 20:08, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the person who'd already got this article PROD'ed - nobody had disputed the PROD, so why was it felt necessary to bring it to AfD...?!?!?! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:55, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agreed, that was a strange decision to send this to AfD when it was already PRODed, although the user has explained why. Still, this club hasn't played at a high enough level, and there's no evidence of general notability. Bettia(talk) 10:33, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as far as I can tell, they don't meet this requirement: "Teams that are not eligible for national cups must be shown to meet broader WP:N criteria." Cocytus[»talk«] 23:52, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.