The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:44, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
WP:TOOSOON article about an as yet unreleased film, not properly sourced as the subject of sufficient production coverage to override the primary notability criteria for films at WP:NFO. As always, we do not want to indiscriminately maintain an article about every single film that enters the production pipeline — even films that start production can still fail to ever actually be completed or released, and/or can be completed and released yet still fail to surpass any of our notability tests for films.
So films aren't automatically entitled to have articles just because it's possible to show a small handful of production coverage while they're in the pipeline — that's permitted in the case of very high-profile projects that can show so much production coverage that even if they failed they'd still be notable failures anyway, but is not automatically extended to every film that enters production. There are just four footnotes here, however, and even one of those is merely the caption to a photograph rather than substantive coverage.
Obviously no prejudice against recreation if and when it is released and starts garnering the critical reviews that are much more central to establishing the permanent notability of a film -- but just having a couple of casting announcements isn't enough in and of itself. Bearcat (talk) 19:40, 23 January 2023 (UTC)