The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:53, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Amelon (ancient king)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an article about a king who is named in one ancient text and who is not considered historical. I don't Wikipedia should have articles about possibly fictional persons about whom otherwise virtually nothing is recorded or written about by modern scholars. Zoeperkoe (talk) 16:16, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the king does not even appear on the SKL, but on a Babylonian text of dubious notability and truthfulness from 2000 years later. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:54, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per rationale of nominator. Fails GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:38, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.