The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 19:53, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable actor with only passing mentions and fluff pieces in mostly unreliable sources. CHRISSYMAD❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 00:42, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article reads too much like a puff piece.TH1980 (talk) 00:55, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per nom, references are unreliable. Drewmutt(^ᴥ^)talk 02:18, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable actor and article written as puffery. All sources listed are gossip magazines and not reliable. --HagennosTalk 00:48, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.