The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:49, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Amhurst Aztecs[edit]

The article was PRODDED because it didn't provide third party references. However, it did make claims to notability in mentioning the team's wins and the nominator apparently made no effort to look for sources as determined by WP:BEFORE. Since unreferenced articles can't stick around forever, I'm putting this decision to the community. Mgm|^(talk) 22:46, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 04:26, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to IGLFA, and spin back out if any one wants to make an article about this. I don't see enough in the article or in a search to say that the team independently notable [Google search, and I don't subscribe to the stub theory; and while an international competition is notable, the prize for winning a competition isn't necessarily a place in history. Mandsford (talk) 15:23, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete team doesn't seem notable. Giant Snowman 13:54, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Giant Snowman 13:54, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:28, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete Soccer club. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:09, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- You think the article should be deleted solely on the basis that it's a soccer club? Erm, OK...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:03, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can find no significant coverage in reliable sources that demonstrate that this club meets the notability guidelines for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:47, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Newsbank searches come up blank, and Google hits seem to be limited to the occasional Gay Games result list and Wikipedia mirrors. Oldelpaso (talk) 16:10, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.