The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret account 17:38, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aminur Rahaman[edit]

Aminur Rahaman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:31, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following article for the same reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:32, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Topu Barman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:32, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 20:12, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 20:12, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 20:12, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Suggesting that there is WP:NORUSH and we show some WP:COMMONSENSE and simply sit on this for a fortnight or so isn't a violation of WP:CRYSTAL. WP:CRYSTAL is in the reference to article contents, not deletion procedures. There's nothing in either article that suggests either player will be making an international appearance, therefore WP:CRYSTAL doesn't apply. Simply saying there should be WP:NORUSH can't ever in itself violate WP:CRYSTAL. There is WP:NOHARM in slowing down the deletion process by a week or so. Nfitz (talk) 14:48, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.