The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Cavarrone 07:46, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anai Mogini[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

At the moment, fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY; have only played at a very low youth level; media coverage is routine. Some of these players are as young as 12 and, yes, I suspect some will be notable in time but, at best, these are a case of WP:TOOSOON. Spiderone 08:48, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please close so that I can renominate the non-notable ones as individual AfDs Spiderone 19:19, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages:

Spiderone 08:48, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:50, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:50, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:50, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:50, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 09:06, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ~~All~~ Most - As much as we need more articles on women's football, the subjects must still meet notability requirements. These girls all fail WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. At best, these are cases of WP:TOOSOON. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 09:06, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the four cited by Fenix down as meeting GNG; I also failed to perform more research before !voting. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 03:22, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the following - the four players below all have had lengthy interview with national newspapers or significant articles written about them in addition to more medium length coverage and have a large amount of more brief mentions in more routine match reporting:

Anai Mogani and Anuching Mogani. Clear GNG from google search as evidenced by the below. The fact they are twins has helped them garner a decent amount of coverage.

Anuching, Anai to become the first twins to represent Bangladesh women's football - dedicated article in national newspaper
The unstoppable twins - dedicated article from Dhaka Tribune
Realising Young Dreams - cached page but a lengthy article / interview in a national newspaper
Unrelenting Passion - couple of paragraphs on each squad player

Sanjida Akhtar. GNG indicated by the following english language sources, would expect more in local languages:

Sanjida scores 4.61 article on how the player balances school with international football
Unrelenting Passion - couple of paragraphs on each squad player
Feeling Like The Table Is Shaking: Sanjida

Shamsunnahar. GNG indicated by the following english language sources, would expect more in local languages:

‘I dream of playing in the World Cup’ - lengthy interview with player in Dhaka Tribune
Unrelenting Passion - couple of paragraphs on each squad player

Delete the following: Mahmuda Akter, Masura Parvin, Nargis Khatun, Nazma, Ruksana Begum, Taslima. All Fail NFOOTY as have not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subjects have garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Of all the players, bar Taslima, who seems to have gained some tangential coverage following an assault on her father, the only source I could find that went into any detail outside of routine match reporting was this one, which is insufficient on its own for GNG. Fenix down (talk) 12:22, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, Anai Mogini and Anuching Mogani as those pass GNG, Sanjida Akhter, Shamsunnahar, Sheuli Azim also played in national senior side in 2016 South Asian games. 1, 2, the present national line-up features five players (Sanjida Akhter, Sheuli Azim, Marzia, Shamsunnahar, Maria Manda) from a common district, Mymensingh. Thus they pass the NFOOTY.

Another dedicated article for Sanjida Sanjida in 7th heaven.

Masura Parvin selected for national team 1 2in 2014 but whether she played or not, that is not sure. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 16:53, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure whether these players meet WP:NFOOTY, this indicates that the men's competition at the very least was an U23 tournament, though it is not explicit about the women's tournament. Given the age of some of the girls noted here though, it does seem like a junior competition. Can anyone confirm? Fenix down (talk) 09:01, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Fenix down:, the tournament's wiki page is 2016 South Asian Games – Women's. And it is certainly not U23 tournament as the age of top three goal scorer are 24, 26, 29. Also you can see the age column of tournament team squads. Also, while the Indian Women's football senior team will be fielded in the South Asian Games, the Men's football team will feature U-23 players. (quoted from news article). Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 18:41, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Ibrahim Husain Meraj: I would update my comments above accordingly, however, can you confirm that she has actually played? The sources in the tournament article are a bit threadbare and do not mention her. Being part of a squad is not sufficient to pass WP:NFOOTY. Fenix down (talk) 10:18, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Fenix down:, Sheuli Azim, Sanjida Akhter, Shamsunnahar, Srimoti Krishnarani all played against Nepal in first game of 12th SA Games in 5th February, 2016. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 03:04, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Some meet GNG. Nominating editor should do due diligence rather than proposing deletion of articles on women's footballers en masse. Hmlarson (talk) 03:12, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the four that meet GNG as highlighted by Fenix down, Delete the rest. Giant Snowman 11:17, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all - re-nominate individually as previously mentioned. --Jimbo^[online] 18:27, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.